Toyota Job Site Analysis & Job Description

Job Site Analysis Report

Weight Checking/Barcoding Station

FTS California – Hayward, CA

Prepared by:

Dr. Allen S. Miller

Date of Analysis:

February 12, 2004

COMPANY

FTS California-Hayward, CA

JOB TITLE

CONTACT PERSON

Mr. Peter Ingenhutt

D.O.T. EQUIVALENT

POSITION

HR/Safety Manager

D.O.T. NUMBER

OTHER CONTACT

DEPARTMENT

POSITION

BREAKS

60 Min.

ADDRESS

18231 Murphy Parkway

SHIFT DURATION

8.0 Hrs.

CITY, STATE

Hayward, CA

REAL WORK TIME

8 Hrs.

ZIP

95330

DAYS WORKED

Monday to Friday

TELEPHONE

(209) 858-0400 ext 130

HOURS PER WEEK

40 Hrs.

FACSIMILE

(209) 858-9293

SHIFT

1

PHYSICAL DEMAND LEVEL (UPPER BODY)

Medium

E-MAIL

Peter.Ingenhutt@Fueltotalsystems.com

PHYSICAL DEMAND LEVEL (LOWER BODY)

Sedentary – Light

DATE

2/10/04

UNION PLANT?

No

JOB DESCRIPTION

FUNCTIONAL JOB DESCRIPTION:

Weight Bar-coding Station

KEY JOB TASKS:

Employee must inspect and weigh freshly manufactured tank and place barcode on it. The employee must additionally place parts and work machinery in a safe manner.

DATA:

Information, knowledge and conceptions related to data, people or things obtained by observation and mental creation.

Synthesizing
Coordinating
Analyzing
Compiling
Computing
Copying
Comparing

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

INFREQUENT TASKS: None

WORK PACE:

Self-paced to accomplish and finish 60 parts per hour, or in accordance with the demands of the employer.

PERSONAL TRAITS:

Ability to comprehend and follow instructions.
Ability to perform simple and repetitive tasks.
Ability to maintain a work pace appropriate to a given work load.
Ability to relate to other people beyond giving and receiving instructions.
Ability to influence people.
Ability to perform complex or varied tasks.
Ability to make generalizations, evaluations or decisions without immediate supervision.
Ability to accept and carry out responsibility for direction, control and planning.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

POSTURE AND MOVEMENT

SUSTAINED POSTURE OVERVIEW

Max. Consec. Min. Per Hour

Total Daily Hours

Possible Change Optional

Further Description

Sitting

0

0

No

N/A

Static Standing

20

2

No

Line Dependent

Dynamic Standing

40

4

No

Line Dependent

Walking

10

2

No

Line Dependent

Driving

0

N/A

STATIC STANDING

Maximum Consecutive Minutes Per Hour

55

Total Daily Hours

8.0

Possible Change Optional?

No

Floor Surface

Cement, rubber mats

Step Available?

N/A

Further Description

DYNAMIC STANDING

Maximum Consecutive Minutes Per Hour

55

Total Daily Hours

8.0

Possible Change Optional?

Yes

Floor Surface

Cement, rubber mats

Further Description

WORK STATION

WORKSTATION LAYOUT

SURFACE 1 (See Below)

SURFACE 2 (See Below)

Surface

Roller Track

Height

39 in.

Depth

13 in.

Length

36 in.

Surface

Steel

Debris

No

Floor Surface

Cement with rubber mat

Comments

ERGONOMIC RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTOR

IDENTIFIED?

COMMENTS

Awkward Posture

Yes

Must bend waist at 45 degrees to weight and place bar code on the tank.

Static Posture

Yes

Standing over a part for 20 seconds.

Repetition

Yes

Job task cycle is 1 part per minute

Forceful Exertion

No

Localized Mechanical Stress

Yes

Hands and low back.

Vibration

No

Extreme Cold

No

Strain Index (SI)

Hand: Right Side

Job Factors                              Level                            SI Score

Intensity of exertion                   Somewhat Hard             3.0

Duration of exertion (%)             33.0                              1.5

Efforts/Minute                           1.0                                0.5

Hand/Wrist Posture                   Good                            1.0

Speed of work                          Fair                               1.0

Duration per Day (hr)                 8.0                                1.0

Strain Index Score: 2.2

Recommendation:

Risk Level = Low

NOTE: Preliminary testing has revealed that jobs associated with distal upper extremity disorders had SI Scores greater than 5.  SI Scores less than or equal to 3 are probably safe.  SI Scores greater than or equal to 7 are probably hazardous.  The Strain Index does not consider stresses related to localized mechanical compression.  This risk factor should be considered separately. For additional information see Moore & Garg (1995).

Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA)

Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA)

Analyst: Allen S. Miller

Job Name: Pressure Test

Workstation ID:

Hand: Right Side

Body Parts                   Posture                                                 RULA Score

Wrist                             Neutral                                                  1

Wrist                             In mid-range of wrist twisting range        1

Upper Arms                  46 to 90                                                3

Lower Arms                   0 to 90                                                  1

Neck                             0 – 10                                                    1

Trunk                            0 – 20                                                    2

Legs                             Legs/feet well-supported                       1

Body Parts       Posture Score   Muscle Score    Force Score      Total

Arm+Wrist                     2                      0                      0          2

Neck+Leg+Trunk            1                      0                      0          1

RULA Grand Score: 2

Recommendation: The Posture is acceptable if it is not maintained or repeated for long periods.

Detailed Summary:

Job Task Requirements

As the tanks come from the robot Station the Tank # 635 for the Toyota Tacoma weighing 9.12 kg (20.06 lbs.) or tank # 930 for the Toyota Corolla weighing 7.56 kg (16.63 lbs.) come down the roller tracks to the weight station (see Diagram 1) the employee must remove two plastic tabs from the sides of the tank that the robot cannon remove.  Additionally, the employee must inspect the “O” ring and weight the tank (see diagram 2). Once the tank is weighed a bar code is printed and the employee must place the tag in its rightful place on the tank.

Diagram 1                                                         Diagram 2

Additionally, the employee must write the weight with a white chalk pen on the tank. This procedure may not be continued in regular production. This procedure requires the employee to stand and work within a neutral posture at a workstation height of 39 inched and reach of 13 inches. Once the tank is weighed it is rolled to a cooling station and then to the thickness station.

Conclusion:

In this case there are no recommendations to adjust body mechanics to work within the confines of this station. It would be advisable to have the robot remove the excess tabs from the tank. The employee will have to remove two (2) tabs per tank with an average force of less than one (1) pound of force. That equals 2 tabs per tank, 480 tanks per cycle that is 960 times a shift an employee must remove this material. There is no recommended remedy, as utilizing the robot would raise the production time to unacceptable levels.

Additionally, due to employee being required to stand and walk around, one recommendation is anti-fatigue mats or possibly a more cost-effective alternative Personal Anti-fatigue Mat™ Insoles (http://www.mega-comfort.com/ergonomic_personal_anti-fatigue_mat_insole.htm). These insoles act as if the employee walked on anti fatigue mats anywhere they walked. The retail cost of the insoles is $19.95 and reduces muscle fatigue and as well as prolongs performance.

One of the positive aspects of the job task is the employee is not required to lift the tank or utilize severe adverse body mechanics to complete the job task. They are also able to walk and move around in a defined area. This dynamic posture is advantageous, as it requires the employee to move all muscle groups, which inherently reduces fatigue, stress and injury. Because of factors that we cannot change i.e. robot mechanics, that are set and financial prohibitive to change, job rotation is crucial, and would delay the effects of ergonomic stress to one area. This would also allow other muscles to work reducing over fatigue and injury.

Post-Offer Employment testing Requirements:

We will concentrate on lumbar, hand, wrist strength and stability. These two areas are crucial in reducing costly injury and claims.

Please understand that when we evaluated these positions, the systems were still being worked out and procedures were still in flux. We will modify these recommendations as production starts and procedures are solidified. If there are any questions concerning the above information, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

________________________________

Dr. Allen Miller

ASM/sd